Debate about AfD ban: Democracy in danger-Landtag under pressure!

Debate about AfD ban: Democracy in danger-Landtag under pressure!

In the state parliament of Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania, a heated debate about the alternative for Germany (AfD) and its right-wing extremist classification by the protection of the constitution. A corresponding application by the SPD and the left to initiate an AfD ban was approved with 40 votes, while 24 MPs and 7 abstained. The discussion shows how serious the political situation is now assessed.

The application pursues the goal of examining possible steps to protect democracy that could result in a ban on partying. This is done in the context of the judicial review of the classification of the AfD as a "secured right -wing extremist", which has been in place since May 2, 2025. This classification is based on a comprehensive report, which, however, remains under lock and key to protect sensitive information. However, several media reported on elements of the report, which indicate extremist positions within the AfD, in particular on topics such as xenophobia and human dignity, which underlines the dangers that emerge from the party.

statements by the actors

The reactions to the classification are mixed. AfD parliamentary group leader Nikolaus Kramer described the decision as legally controversial and criticized the protection of the constitution as a government political tool. This clearly shows that the AfD does not want to recognize the seriousness of this situation.

In contrast, MPs from SPD and Left Party emphasize the need for such measures. SPD parliamentary group leader Julian Barlen warned that the AfD represents a "derogatory world view", especially towards migrants. Left-wing MP Michael Noetzel sees an inevitable tool of defensive democracy in the ban process, which should be implemented quickly. He refers to the teachings from the Weimar Republic, in which a similar ignorance of extremist tendencies had fatal consequences.

The legal framework

Legal scientists emphasize that a ban on party is a complex matter and can only be requested by the Bundestag, Federal Council or the Federal Government. In the case of the AfD, a reassessment could also result in an official classification as an constitutional, which could have a significant impact on state party financing. The dispute over the classification extends over the legal admissibility and can drag on for years.

The AfD has intellectual and legal support in the form of lawsuit, but is also faced with warnings that civil servants with AfD party book could threaten disciplinary measures if they actively participate in the party. In addition, it remains unclear how the statement of the constitution, which enables a rapid review of the procedure, will influence the future development of the party.

In the political arena, it can be clearly felt that opinions about dealing with the AfD diverge far. It remains to be seen whether the government parties will take legal action. The fact is that the debate will gain intensity while society has to deal with the extremism issues.