Post from the job center despite deregistration: Ms. defends herself against threats!

Post from the job center despite deregistration: Ms. defends herself against threats!

In northern Germany, an Instagram video of a woman causes excitement in which she indicates the constant contact of the job center, although she has not been unemployed since she was unsubstantiated. The woman, who was looking for help at the job center after her termination in January, has now received a scholarship for a dissertation project and is not dependent on social benefits. Nevertheless, she has regularly received mediation proposals by post since April, which she sent back after she has clarified that she is not looking for a job. Your situation throws a light on the challenges and misunderstandings with which many affected people are confronted. Derwesten reports that the Federal Employment Agency is excited as unfounded, since no real damage was caused.

What actually happens in the system? The woman was with an employment agency in March and reported to the services on March 15. If you compare this scenario with the current legal situation, it is noteworthy that the newly introduced citizen benefit (formerly Hartz IV) has now abolished the placement of placement. JobCenter can no longer push those affected into any employment, but the pressure to participate remains, which can certainly be felt in the reports of those affected. As the page against Hartz , there is still the possibility to impose sanctions if the obligations received.

a area of ​​tension between rights and obligations

The citizen benefit was introduced as a reform in 2023 to better support job seekers. Despite this reform, beneficiaries must continue to meet the duties of cooperation and have to expect sanctions in the event of non -compliance. According to bpb there are certain changes here: In the future, sanctions for breaches of duty can be spoken of with reduction of benefits from 10% to 30%, but the regulation will continue to be controvers the real application of many is perceived as stressful.

The area of ​​tension between the guarantee of a decent life and the enforcement of obligations to cooperate remains. The discussion about the meaningfulness and effect of sanctions has received new impulses through a judgment of the Federal Constitutional Court in 2019, and yet are unsure how the cuts influence the living conditions of those affected. So we are faced with the question: How can a balance between incentives to take up employment and the protection of the quality of life?

research and social debates

Research shows that sanctions could have a certain motivation effect, but also have negative consequences that can express themselves in the form of withdrawal from the labor market and psychological stress. The potential negative effects on nutrition and general financial stability are particularly concerned about. The question of a balanced regulation remains unanswered and is a constant burden for many.

In this context, it is essential that those affected not only fight on paper with a pen, but also have rights to act against illegal sanctions. An examination by independent advice centers or lawyers for social law is highly recommended to ensure that the regulations are applied fairly and fairly.