Location question of the local administration: Debate about the future in Spantekow!

Transparenz: Redaktionell erstellt und geprüft.
Veröffentlicht am

On September 9th, Mayor Weitmann discussed the future location of the Anklam administration in the Spantekow community center.

Bürgermeister Weitmann diskutiert am 9. September die zukünftige Standortfrage der Amtsverwaltung Anklam im Bürgerhaus Spantekow.
On September 9th, Mayor Weitmann discussed the future location of the Anklam administration in the Spantekow community center.

Location question of the local administration: Debate about the future in Spantekow!

On Tuesday, September 9th, the question of the location of the local administration will be on the agenda again in the Spantekow community center. Mayor Martin Weitmann (independent) has taken up this issue because it is now a matter of determining the future headquarters of the authority. As part of a variation study, three different options should be analyzed in order to find the optimal solution. Loud Northern Courier is up for debate:

  • Die Erweiterung des bisherigen Standorts in Spantekow als alleiniger Verwaltungsstandort.
  • Der Neubau eines zentral gelegenen Verwaltungsstandorts innerhalb des Amtsbereichs.
  • Die Sanierung der bereits im Eigentum des Amtes befindlichen Immobilien in Ducherow und Spantekow.

The preparations for the expansion in Spantekow had to be suspended for the time being in order to give the second variant more space. Weitmann sees his argument strengthened because the community has clearly spoken out in favor of remaining in the Anklam-Land office. This positive signaling effect could give the decision on Tuesday new impetus.

Build on new foundations

With access to pollutant reports that shed light on the construction status of the old official building in Ducherow, the official committee has received valuable information that will be incorporated into its deliberations. Weitmann would like to include these reports in the discussion in order to find the most financially advantageous and practical option.

Considering the various possibilities, carrying out a variant investigation is also essential. This is the only way to determine the economically advantageous procurement option. In accordance with the federal guidelines for the implementation of construction tasks, detailed on the website BBSR, this is necessary to create a structured framework for action. The consideration of life cycle and risk costs also plays a crucial role here.

Economic feasibility studies are key

The legal framework is clear: economic feasibility studies for public construction projects are necessary according to Section 7 of the Federal Budget Code. These investigations help to protect fiscal interests, especially in an area of ​​tension in which potential bidders could benefit from internal calculations in current or future procurement procedures. According to the BMV The aim is to increase the transparency of public-private partnerships through model economic studies.

The decisive step for the future of the official administration is imminent. Tuesday's debate could be groundbreaking for the next few years and is eagerly awaited. Everyone involved is required to develop a good, future-oriented concept that meets the needs of the community.