Process for Neubrandenburg Self-defense case: revision before the BGH!

Process for Neubrandenburg Self-defense case: revision before the BGH!

In the Neubrandenburg process for the shocking shots in front of a danceable that caused a stir in October 2024, it continues. The 24-year-old defendant, who was sentenced to three years in prison for dangerous bodily harm on June 27, lodged an appeal together with his defense. This is reported by the SVZ .

The public prosecutor, on the other hand, calls for a higher imprisonment of almost six years, since the accusation of attempted manslaughter was dropped as part of a self -defense issue. One aspect that will deal with the courts in this case is the legal assessment of self -defense. Depending on the circumstances, a shot from a gun can be seen as a self -defense and as an attempted murder, as can be seen from previous decisions from the Federal Court of Justice (BGH), as the ht criminal law explained.

The argument

The convicted shooter had admitted to acting in self -defense. He initially stated that he had initially made a warning shot before firing the main attacker twice, who was only a shotgun, on the assumption that it was just a fittings. A second attacker, a Chechen, was also said to be shot by him, which continued to escalate the situation. Both men knew each other from the martial arts scene and had to be treated in the clinic because the shots temporarily brought them in mortal danger.

The motivation of the accused of being involved in a conflict of this kind raises questions. What is certain is that self -defense is legitimate under certain conditions. But the case law makes it clear that such a decision often arises in the area of ​​tension between the attacker and the defense lawyer. The criminal rights blogger can be emphasized that the defense is excluded if the defense is excluded or Fear takes place. Here the case of the Neubrandenburg shooter could possibly be assessed differently in the higher court.

The future of the procedure

The revision of the case is now being treated at the BGH, which could estimate one year. During this time, the weapon question remains in the room. The weapon that was involved in the incident remains disappeared to this day. The defendant had already spent eight months in custody before the judgment, but after the verdict, the handcuffs that accompanied him were accepted because the court saw no risk of escape. Ten spectators acknowledged the judgment with loud applause and cheering calls. The course of the process remains exciting and the legal ratings are observed with great attention.