Shot in the Neubrandenburg cultural park: self -defense or dangerous threat?

Im Amtsgericht Neubrandenburg wird ein Schussvorfall aus dem Kulturpark verhandelt. Angeklagte wegen versuchter Körperverletzung.
In the district court of Neubrandenburg, a shot from the cultural park is negotiated. Designed for attempted bodily harm. (Symbolbild/MND)

Shot in the Neubrandenburg cultural park: self -defense or dangerous threat?

Neubrandenburg, Deutschland - The shot incident in the Kulturpark Neubrandenburg, which occurred in May 2024, is currently being negotiated before the district court. The accused, a 34-year-old woman, faces serious allegations: she is said to have threatened a man who has put her fiancee with a real Magnum drum revolver. In the past few weeks, this case has already caused many headlines, especially since he is the third shot in the region who ends up in court and raises the question of whether it was a legitimate self -defense or not how [Nordkurier] (https://www.nordkurier.de/regional/neubrandenburg/wieder-scharfers-gart-in-neubrandenburg-der- ornotwehr-3740135) reported.

in the argument between the craftsman, her fiance, and the günen -like friend, the situation quickly escalated. After a break -in in his company, in which he suffered damage of around 20,000 euros, the craftsman had already suspected some acquaintances. At a meeting to get to the bottom of this matter, there was a violent confrontation that finally culminated in a shot, which, however, did not hit anyone. The police arrived at the scene shortly after the incident, and everyone involved was still on site.

the self -defense question

Central question in the procedure is self -defense. According to Section 32 of the Criminal Code, a self -defense act is only permitted if it takes place towards a current, illegal attack and is necessary and is proportionate. This means that a shot could only be justified if the situation actually required this, such as anwalt.de. The principle "in Dubio Pro Reo" also states that if in doubt, it must be decided in favor of the accused, which could be of great importance in this case.

A crime report will be presented at the next trial on July 14, 2025 to create further clarity. A video of an alarm system that documents the shot and the following shouting could also provide crucial information. Tensions in the courtroom were already felt during the first trial when a viewer insulted the accused. It remains to be seen which judgment will be made on the continuing negotiation day, since the emotional and legal complexity of the situation raises profound questions about self -defense and the limits of self -defense.

A look at the legal situation

The complexity of the legal framework is illustrated by current decisions by the Federal Court of Justice, which deal with the use of firearms in self -defense situations. In particular, the question of whether there is a "current attack" and whether it was necessary to use a weapon to defend it, such as Jura-Online. The decision of the BGH from 2023 makes it clear that the necessity must be checked in individual cases, which makes the legal assessment particularly challenging in a case.

The upcoming negotiation promises not only for those involved themselves, but also for general case law in such complex self -defense issues. Meanwhile, the population in Neubrandenburg remains intently observed, since this procedure will certainly still provide some discussions.

Details
OrtNeubrandenburg, Deutschland
Quellen