Fight for the grade: Testify is complaining about examination results in Göttingen!

Fight for the grade: Testify is complaining about examination results in Göttingen!

An exciting turn in the examination right ensures discussion in academic circles. In the case of a candidate that did not exist in writing in the second state examination, there was a legal discussion that is representative of the challenges that many students face. The decision was made on June 17, 2025, after the examinee had already made a first attempt to go in his pants and is now on the way through another attempt. His journey started in the legal clerkship on September 1, 2021.

After a supplementary preparation service and a repeat examination in January 2024, the person concerned received the notification of his further failure. He defended himself towards this message and made an objection. His complaint with the Göttingen Administrative Court is now waiting for a decision. The candidate also applied for pronounced legal protection in order to be temporarily admitted to the oral examination. But the urgent application was rejected by the VG Göttingen.

dispute over the admission to the oral examination

The reason for the rejection of VG Göttingen was clear: a preliminary admission to the oral examination was not the subject of an order procedure. Finally, the overall examination grade in accordance with Section 12 (4) NJAG cannot be determined, insofar as the examinee did not pass the required three supervisory work with at least "sufficient". A deviation decision by the examination board according to Section 12 (5) NJAG is also not possible without a final written services.

But the Lüneburg Higher Administrative Court, in which the affected complaint filed a complaint, decided differently. It found that Section 12 (4) NJAG does not define a specific calculation time for the overall examination grade. This means that the final note can be determined even after the legal conclusion of the lawsuit. It is also conceivable that the examination board will later make a deviation decision. It is important that the examiners can preserve their overall impression beyond the exam day.

exam structure and their meaning

But what is actually part of an oral exam? According to the University of Göttingen is clearly regulated. The exam is divided into a main examination that takes place in the teaching area of ​​the speaker, as well as two minor tests that are taken from minor examiners: inside. It is interesting that a minor can also come from another faculty of the Göttingen University.

The requirements for the main examination are high: in addition to a deep scientific understanding, the ability to judge critically is also required. So it is not an easy exam that is to the test subjects here. One of the examination modalities is that a log is created via every oral examination, and the grade is determined by the examiners and the assessors.

challenges in examination law

The legal framework around exams are complex. Exams are not only part of the training process, but also crucial for the professional future of the test subjects. Procedure regulations are of the greatest importance. According to Teipel Law , procedural errors can creep in quickly, be it by disregarding deadlines or inadequate examination conditions.

The chances of uncovering such errors are often low, since insight into the file is not enough in many cases to prove them. The 揾 cracks turns how important the correct procedure for exams is and how much students are dependent on the legality of the procedures. The decision of the OVG Lüneburg could be groundbreaking for many test subjects and have a lasting impact on the examination.